Understanding the S-Curve in Project Planning: Why It’s Not Always “S” Shaped

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN/SEARCH TITLES

Demystifying the S-Curve in Project Management: Why It’s Not Always an “S”
S-Curve Analysis in Project Planning: Causes of Shape Variations
Understanding S-Curve Deviations: What Impacts the Shape?
S-Curve vs. Reality: Why Your Project Progress May Look Different
How to Interpret S-Curves in Project Management: A Practical Guide
S-Curve Challenges: Should You Adjust Your Resource Allocation?
Why Your Project’s S-Curve Doesn’t Always Look Like an “S”
S-Curve Planning: Manpower Allocation vs. Ideal Project Flow
Mastering the S-Curve: What It Really Tells About Your Project
Does Your Project Need a Perfect S-Curve? A Strategic Perspective

DESCRIPTION

In project management, the S-curve is a fundamental tool used to visualize project progress, resource allocation, and performance over time. However, one common question that arises—especially from those less familiar with project planning—is, why is the S-curve not always in the shape of an “S”? To address this, we must delve into the mechanics of the S-curve, explore what influences its shape, and discuss the impact of manpower allocation and timelines on achieving an “S” shape.

This article will provide insights into whether you should adhere strictly to planned manpower allocation based on the timeline or adjust your resource histogram to create a classic bell-shaped distribution that aligns with the traditional S-curve.

What Is an S-Curve?

An S-curve is a graphical representation of cumulative progress over time in a project. It is called an “S” curve because it typically starts with slow progress (the lower tail of the “S”), accelerates during the middle phases (the steep slope), and then tapers off as the project nears completion (the upper tail).

In essence, the S-curve reflects three key phases of a project:

Initiation and Mobilization: Progress is slow due to planning, setup, and mobilization of resources.

Execution and Peak Activity: Work accelerates as manpower, materials, and equipment are fully mobilized.

Completion and Closeout: Progress slows down as the bulk of the work is completed, and final adjustments or testing take place.

VIDEO TUTORIAL

However, not all projects follow this idealized shape, which leads to the question: Should the curve always look like an “S”?

Common Misconceptions About the S-Curve

It’s not uncommon for those unfamiliar with project management to question why the S curve doesn’t always resemble a perfect “S.” This misunderstanding can stem from a lack of experience in interpreting project data. In reality, the shape of the curve can fluctuate based on various factors, including unexpected delays or resource allocation.

Why Is the S-Curve Not Always in an “S” Shape?

Project Type and Complexity:

In straightforward projects with consistent work processes, the curve may naturally follow an “S” shape.

Complex projects with variable workflows, dependencies, or long lead times for materials may deviate significantly.

Manpower Allocation:

Uneven allocation of resources—such as ramping up manpower too quickly or maintaining a flat workforce throughout—can distort the shape.

If resources are deployed linearly without adjusting for workload peaks and troughs, the curve may appear more linear than “S” shaped.

Front-Loaded or Back-Loaded Activities:

Projects with intensive upfront planning, design work, or procurement phases may show a flatter start.

Conversely, projects with significant testing and commissioning phases near the end may show a steeper rise later.

Delays and Rescheduling:

Unexpected delays, such as permitting issues or supply chain disruptions, can cause deviations from the planned curve.

Schedule compression or acceleration measures may alter the curve’s shape further.

Should You Aim for a Classic S-Curve?

While the “S” shape is idealized and often used as a benchmark, it is not a mandatory outcome. Instead, the goal should be to create a realistic and achievable plan that aligns with the project’s scope, timeline, and resource availability.

The question becomes: Is it better to adhere to the original plan with manpower allocated based on the timeline, or should you adjust the manpower histogram to achieve an “S” shape?

To answer this, let’s analyze the two approaches:

1- Following the Planned Manpower Allocation:

This approach involves allocating manpower according to the original project schedule, regardless of whether the resulting curve resembles an “S” shape.

Advantages:

Alignment with Project Scope: Ensures that manpower is allocated to match the specific needs of each activity.

Cost Control: Prevents overstaffing during periods of low activity, reducing unnecessary costs.

Practicality: Reflects the actual workflow of the project rather than forcing a generic pattern.

Disadvantages:

Irregular Resource Utilization: May lead to peaks and troughs in manpower usage, which can be inefficient.

Perception Issues: Stakeholders unfamiliar with the rationale may question deviations from the classic S-curve.

2. Adjusting the Manpower Histogram to Achieve an S-Shape:

This approach involves redistributing manpower to create a bell-shaped histogram, which typically results in an “S”-shaped cumulative curve.

Advantages:

Predictability: A bell-shaped manpower distribution is easier to communicate and understand.

Resource Optimization: Provides a smoother workflow by minimizing sudden spikes or drops in workforce levels.

Stakeholder Confidence: Aligns with traditional expectations of project progress.

Disadvantages:

Risk of Overstaffing or Understaffing: Adjusting the histogram to achieve an ideal shape may result in inefficiencies.

Deviation from Actual Needs: The focus on achieving a specific curve shape may compromise the alignment of resources with project requirements.

Potential for Delays: Overloading the workforce in certain phases may lead to bottlenecks or errors.

Finding the Balance

In practice, the best approach lies somewhere between these two extremes. Here are some guidelines to strike a balance:

Understand Project Requirements: Analyze the nature of the project to determine whether a strict adherence to the S-curve is necessary or feasible.

Leverage Resource Histograms:

Use manpower histograms to identify and address resource peaks and troughs.

Consider smoothing manpower levels where possible without compromising the schedule.

Communicate the Rationale:

Clearly explain the reasons behind any deviations from the classic S-curve to stakeholders.

Emphasize that the goal is to meet project objectives, not to force a specific curve shape.

Monitor and Adjust:

Regularly track project progress and compare it with the planned S-curve.

Adjust manpower allocation dynamically to address unexpected challenges or delays.

Utilize Software Tools: Tools like Primavera P6, Microsoft Project, PlanningP6 or similar platforms can help model resource allocation and visualize the impact on the S-curve.

Real-World Scenarios

Scenario 1: Infrastructure Project

In a large infrastructure project, the initial phases involve extensive design and permitting, resulting in a flatter start to the curve. During construction, manpower ramps up significantly, creating the steep slope. If commissioning and handover phases are less resource-intensive, the curve will taper off. In this case, adjusting manpower to force an “S” shape may not reflect the actual workflow and could lead to inefficiencies.

Scenario 2: Manufacturing Facility Construction

A project to build a manufacturing facility may require a consistent workforce throughout most phases, resulting in a linear or slightly bell-shaped curve. If the workforce is suddenly ramped up to achieve an “S” shape, it could lead to overcrowding or resource wastage.

CONCLUSION

The S-curve is a valuable tool for tracking and communicating project progress, but its shape is not a definitive measure of success. The focus should always be on realistic planning and efficient resource allocation that aligns with the project’s goals and constraints.

If achieving an “S” shape requires significant adjustments that compromise practicality or efficiency, it’s better to prioritize the actual needs of the project. By understanding the factors that influence the curve and adopting a flexible approach, project managers can ensure successful outcomes while addressing stakeholder concerns effectively.

Ultimately, whether the S-curve resembles a perfect “S” is less important than delivering the project on time, within budget, and to the required quality standards.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

For a comprehensive understanding, we recommend exploring our dedicated tutorials on Primavera P6 relationships. These tutorials are accessible through our Planning P6 Tutorials Dictionary (REV-003). Simply search for keywords like “relationship” or “Primavera P6 integration” to access relevant content.